Why do we argue cases the way we do? – Strategery

Today Florida Carry Lead Counsel Eric Friday filed a supplemental authority in Norman v. State based on our recent victory in Florida Carry v. UNF in the Florida 1st DCA.

These seemingly unrelated cases are actually quite complementary within our litigation strategy.

 The dissent also argues that the university has the power to regulate otherwise lawful activities in the context of student conduct, i.e., consuming alcohol in a classroom or smoking in a dorm room. While true in certain contexts, restricting recreational activities is a far cry from restricting a fundamental, constitutional right to keep and bear arms for self-defense.

There is a lot more in the decision that we will be using in some of our other cases soon.

This entry was posted in Guns. Bookmark the permalink.

1 Response to Why do we argue cases the way we do? – Strategery

  1. Pingback: Monday Pre-Freeze News Links | Shall Not Be Questioned

Comments are closed.